Interobserver Variability in the Detection of Cervical-Thoracic Hodgkin's Disease by Computed Tomography
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 17 (7) , 2153
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.7.2153
Abstract
PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) scans of the neck and chest are obtained at diagnosis of Hodgkin's disease to establish disease extent, plan radiotherapy, and serve as baseline studies for subsequent evaluation of response to therapy. However, differences in interpretation may occur even among experienced radiologists. This study was designed to test the extent of variation among expert radiologists' interpretations and to assess how their interpretations differed from that of the primary (institutional) radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five radiologists independently reviewed randomly selected CT scans of 59 patients enrolled onto two Pediatric Oncology Group Hodgkin's disease treatment protocols. For each patient, 31 potential disease sites were scored as positive, negative, uncertain, or unassessable. Agreement among the reviewers and between the reviewers and the primary readers was analyzed. RESULTS: For 58% of the sites, at least four of the five reviewers agreed in ≥ 80% of the cases. Kappa analysis showed moderate agreement in approximately two thirds of the sites and poor agreement in the remainder. There was moderate agreement between a majority of the expert readers and the primary radiologist reports for approximately one third of the sites, and agreement was poor in two thirds. CONCLUSION: There are disparities among radiologists' interpretations of cervical-thoracic CT imaging of patients with Hodgkin's disease. This variability may affect patient care and the performance and results of multi-institutional clinical trials. We propose that a standardized method of reporting might improve the consistency of interpretation of CT scans in these patients.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Observer variation in plain radiography of the lumbosacral spine.The British Journal of Radiology, 1998
- Variability in the detection of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes in staging lung cancer: a comparison of contrast-enhanced and unenhanced CT.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image.The British Journal of Radiology, 1997
- An assessment of inter-observer agreement and accuracy when reporting plain radiographsClinical Radiology, 1997
- Interreader reliability for a new classification of lumbar disk diseaseAcademic Radiology, 1996
- Interobserver Variation in the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Mediastinal Lymph Node Size in Patients With Potentially Resectable Lung CancerChest, 1995
- Interobserver variability and accuracy of computed tomographic assessment of nodal status in lung cancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- Diagnostic imaging evaluation of hodgkin';s disease and non-hodgkin';s lymphomaCancer, 1991
- Hodgkin disease: contributions of chest CT in the initial staging evaluation.Radiology, 1986
- Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lymphomas in children: utilization of radiological modalities.Radiology, 1986