Attitudes of internal medicine subspecialty fellows toward primary care
- 1 February 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 144 (2) , 329-333
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.144.2.329
Abstract
• Subspecialists deliver a substantial proportion of primary care but little is known about how their training affects their attitudes toward this role. We surveyed a department of medicine to determine fellows' (N=34) attitudes toward primary care and how these compared with the attitudes of house staff (N=45) and faculty (N=66). Continuous, coordinated, and accessible care as departmental policy was almost unanimously endorsed by all physicians. In contrast, fellows less often supported the provision of such care for their own patients in actual clinical situations. Fellows were also less likely than either house staff or faculty to endorse primary care attributes for their own patients. Departments of medicine should examine how negative attitudes toward primary care develop in subspecialty fellows and whether these attitudes persist after fellowship. (Arch Intern Med1984;144:329-333)This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Where Have All the Doctors Gone?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1980
- National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: III. Subspecialty Fellowship Training 1976-1977Annals of Internal Medicine, 1979
- National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: IV. Residency and Fellowship Training 1977-1978 and 1978-1979Annals of Internal Medicine, 1979
- A National Study of Internal Medicine and Its Specialties: II. Primary Care in Internal MedicineAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1979
- A National Study of Internal Medicine and Its Specialties: I. An Overview of the Practice of Internal MedicineAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1979
- National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: II. A Typology of Residency Training Programs in Internal MedicineAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1978