Maintenance chrysotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of 2 dose schedules.
Open Access
- 1 June 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Vol. 40 (3) , 250-253
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.40.3.250
Abstract
Maintenance treatment with chrysotherapy was given to 44 rheumatoid patients after a total of 1.0 g weekly injections of sodium aurothiomalate. 21 patients continued with 50 mg injections every 2 weeks, and 23 patients received the same dose at 4-week intervals. Their progress was followed over 1 year, after which time their clinical improvements were equally well sustained. Toxicity was greater in those patients receiving fortnightly injections. Five patients suffered a relapse after 8 months. These were not related to the frequency of injections nor to the serum gold levels. There appeared to be no advantage in maintenance injections at fortnightly intervals.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long Term ChrysotherapyArthritis & Rheumatism, 1979
- Followup study of chrysotherapyArthritis & Rheumatism, 1979
- Long‐term chrysotherapy in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1979
- A double‐blind trial of high versus conventional dosages of gold salts for rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1977
- Effect of Gold Treatment on the Progression of Erosions in Ra PatientsScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1977
- A multicentre1) controlled trial of the effects of different dosage of gold therapy, followed by a maintenance dosageInflammation Research, 1976
- BLOOD AND URINE GOLD LEVELS DURING CHRYSOTHERAPY FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISRheumatology, 1975
- Serum gold determinations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving sodium aurothiomalate.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1973
- Monitoring serum gold values to improve chrysotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1973
- Methods of scoring the progression of radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Correlation of radiologic, clinical and laboratory abnormalitiesArthritis & Rheumatism, 1971