Assertiveness Through Different Media
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Language and Social Psychology
- Vol. 5 (1) , 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x8651001
Abstract
The aim of this study was twofold: first to ascertain the amount of difficulty reported to be experienced by subjects communicating assertive mes-sages through different media (letter, telephone, face-to-face) and secondly to investigate the role of individual differences (assertiveness itself and fear of punishment) in the difficulty of communication. With few exceptions the subjects found the communication of specific assertiveness messages by letter least diffi-cult and face-to-face most difficult. The two individual difference variables produced a number of significant main effects (individual differences, media), but almost no interaction effects. Results are discussed in terms of the measurement and training of assertiveness as well as the social psychology of telecommunications.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Situational context: Effects on perceptions of assertive and unassertive behaviorBehavior Therapy, 1985
- The message, the context and the mediumLanguage & Communication, 1982
- Face and tone of voice in the communication of deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- Sex differences in self‐reported assertiveness in BritainBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1981
- Verbal, vocal, and visible factors in judgments of another's affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981
- The relative contribution of verbal, vocal, and visual channels to person perception: Experiment and critiqueSemiotica, 1981
- Psychometric properties of the Wolpe-Lazarus assertiveness scaleBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1979
- Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- An assertion inventory for use in assessment and researchBehavior Therapy, 1975
- Effects of Medium of Communication on Experimental NegotiationHuman Relations, 1974