The relevance of occult axillary micrometastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ
- 29 September 2003
- Vol. 98 (10) , 2105-2113
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11761
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents 20% of newly diagnosed breast carcinoma cases. Historically, the incidence of axillary metastasis in DCIS has been small (1–2%) and its significance has been debated. It is widely known that serial sections of lymph nodes coupled with keratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) increases identification of micrometastasis. The advent of sentinel lymph node evaluation underscores the need to reevaluate the significance of occult micrometastases in DCIS. METHODS Patients with DCIS and negative axillary lymph nodes from 1974 to 1992 were selected from the Saint Barnabas Medical Center Tumor Registry. All diagnoses were confirmed, and paraffin blocks were retrieved after acceptance into the study. Seven serial sections were obtained from each block and evaluated with two cytokeratin IHC stains. Clinical follow‐up ranged from 10 to 28 years. RESULTS One hundred two patients were included in the study. Micrometastases were identified in 13 patients (13%), mostly on 1 level and composed of microscopic clusters in the subcapsular sinus. Seven of these lymph node–positive patients (58%) had high‐grade comedo DCIS, 4 (33%) had intermediate grades of various types of DCIS, and one had a low‐grade micropapillary DCIS. The overall disease recurrence rate was 12%, but micrometasis was not detected in any of the patients who developed disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Serial IHC evaluation of lymph nodes dramatically increased the identification of occult micrometastasis. However, IHC detected micrometastasis has no apparent clinical significance in DCIS, based on the current long‐term clinicopathologic study. Therefore, the authors questioned the significance of occult micrometastasis, identified by IHC, in DCIS of any type and extent. Further evaluation and follow‐up of lymph node micrometastases in patients with invasive tumors of various sizes are needed. The current findings would not support altering the stage of patients with DCIS and micrometastasis detected by IHC only. Cancer 2003. © 2003 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Occult Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer Do MatterThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2002
- Occult axillary lymph node metastases are of no prognostic significance in breast cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 2002
- AJCC Cancer Staging ManualPublished by Springer Nature ,2002
- Early distant relapse in ?node-negative? breast cancer patients is not predicted by occult axillary lymph node metastases, but by the features of the primary tumourThe Journal of Pathology, 2001
- Pathologic analysis of sentinel and nonsentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinomaCancer, 2000
- Sentinel Node Biopsy in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ PatientsAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2000
- Lymph node micrometastases from breast carcinomaCancer, 1997
- Occult axillary lymph node metastases in “node-negative” breast carcinomaHuman Pathology, 1993
- Micrometastases to axillary lymph nodes from carcinoma of breast: Detection by immunohistochemistry and prognostic significanceBritish Journal of Cancer, 1987
- Significance of Axillary Macrometastases and Micrometastases in Mammary CancerAnnals of Surgery, 1971