Nomograms to Predict Pathologic Complete Response and Metastasis-Free Survival After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
- 20 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (33) , 8331-8339
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.01.2898
Abstract
To combine clinical variables associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) and distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS) after preoperative chemotherapy (PC) into a prediction nomogram. Data from 496 patients treated with anthracycline PC at the Institut Gustave Roussy were used to develop and calibrate a nomogram for pCR based on multivariate logistic regression. This nomogram was tested on two independent cohorts of patients treated at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The first cohort (n = 337) received anthracycline; the second cohort (n = 237) received a combination of paclitaxel and anthracycline PC. A separate nomogram to predict DMFS was developed using Cox proportional hazards regression model. The pCR nomogram based on clinical stage, estrogen receptor status, histologic grade, and number of preoperative chemotherapy cycles had good discrimination and calibration in the training and the anthracycline-treated validation sets (concordance indices, 0.77, 0.79). In the paclitaxel plus anthracycline group, when the predicted pCR rate was less than 14%, the observed rate was 7.5%; for a predicted rate of ≥ 38%, the actual rate was 85%. For a predicted rate between 14% to 38%, the observed rates were 50% with weekly and 27% with 3-weekly paclitaxel. This indicates that patients with intermediate chemotherapy sensitivity benefit the most from the optimized schedule of paclitaxel. Patients unlikely to achieve pCR to anthracylines remain at low probability for pCR, even after inclusion of paclitaxel. The nomogram for DMFS had a concordance index of 0.72 in the validation set and outperformed other prediction tools (P = .02). Our nomograms predict pCR accurately and can serve as a basis to integrate future molecular markers into a clinical prediction model.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Systemic Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Meta-AnalysisJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Technology Insight: emerging techniques to predict response to preoperative chemotherapy in breast cancerNature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2004
- Breast‐conserving surgery after neoadjuvant anthracycline‐based chemotherapy for large breast tumorsCancer, 2004
- Proceedings of the Consensus Conference on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Carcinoma of the Breast, April 26–28, 2003, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCancer, 2004
- Incidence and Prognostic Significance of Complete Axillary Downstaging After Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With T1 to T3 Tumors and Cytologically Proven Axillary Metastatic Lymph NodesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Computer Program to Assist in Making Decisions About Adjuvant Therapy for Women With Early Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Biologic Markers as Predictors of Clinical Outcome From Systemic Therapy for Primary Operable Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Clinical Course of Breast Cancer Patients With Complete Pathologic Primary Tumor and Axillary Lymph Node Response to Doxorubicin-Based Neoadjuvant ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Clinical prognostic and predictive factors for primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1992