Does Dual Chamber or Atrial Pacing Prevent Atrial Fibrillation? The Need for a Randomized Controlled Trial
- 1 August 1992
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 15 (8) , 1109-1113
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03112.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survey of cardiac pacing in the United States in 1989The American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Comparison between ventricular inhibited pacing and physiologic pacing in sick sinus syndromeThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Symptoms, Cardiovascular Risk Profile and Spontaneous ECG in Paced Patients: A Five‐Year Follow‐Up StudyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- Relation of prognosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defects and modes of permanent cardiac pacingThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Influence of cardiac pacing mode on the long-term development of atrial fibrillationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Long‐Term Follow‐Up of Patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome: A Comparison of Clinical Aspects Among Unpaced, Ventricular Inhibited Paced, and Physiologically Paced GroupsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: Effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortalityAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakersThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Atrial versus ventricular pacing in sinus node disease: A treatment comparison studyAmerican Heart Journal, 1986
- Natural History of High-Risk Bundle-Branch BlockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982