Natural Free-Running Period in Vertebrate Animal Populations
- 28 April 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 156 (3774) , 531-534
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.156.3774.531
Abstract
Regression analysis (analysis of covariance) is contrasted with the conventional "mean period length" for estimating the length of period of the spontaneous activity frequency (free-running period) in population samples of Gila monsters (Heloderma suspectum) and kangaroo rats (Dipodomys merriami) in the Sonoran Desert. The mean period length in each population does not differ significantly from 24:00 hours (P > .05) and it does not differ significantly (P > .05) between the species studied; the probability that the free-running period a(in constant dark) in natural populations of Gila monsters and kangaroo rats is different from 24:00.0 is less than 1 in 1000 (P < .001). The so-called "mean period length" is of little or no use for precise determination of the period and phase relationships in circadian rhythms; moreover, it is entirely without value for statistical testing of differences either within or between populations.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Daily Light Sensitivity Rhythm in a RodentScience, 1960
- Exogenous and Endogenous Components in Circadian RhythmsCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1960
- Effects of Tissue Temperature on Mammalian Activity RhythmsPublished by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ,1960
- Phase Control of Activity in a RodentCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1960
- Biological Clock in the UnicornScience, 1957
- Frequenz nderungen der Aktivit tsperiodik bei M usen im Dauerlicht und DauerdunkelPflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 1952