Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for enhanced MR imaging of brain and spine tumours in children
- 28 January 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Pediatric Radiology
- Vol. 35 (5) , 501-510
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1392-4
Abstract
Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) demonstrates superior enhancement of brain tumours in adult patients than Gd-DTPA. To determine whether Gd-BOPTA has advantages over Gd-DTPA for enhanced MR imaging of paediatric brain and spine tumours. Sixty-three subjects, aged 6 months to 16 years, who were enrolled in a prospective, fully blinded, randomized parallel-group phase III clinical trial, received 0.1 mmol/kg doses of either Gd-BOPTA (n=29) or Gd-DTPA (n=34). The MR images were acquired before and within 10 min of contrast agent injection. The primary objective was to compare the difference from pre-dose to post-dose lesion visualization between Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA. Lesion visualization was determined as the sum of individual scores for three criteria of lesion morphological characteristics (lesion border delineation, internal morphology, and contrast enhancement), each assessed qualitatively using 4-point scales. Quantitative evaluation compared changes in lesion-to-background (LBR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios and per cent enhancement. Monitoring for adverse events and evaluation of vital signs and laboratory values was performed. Pre-dose to post-dose changes in lesion visualization were significantly better for Gd-BOPTA for both lesion level (2.68+/-2.17 vs. 1.05+/-1.90, P=0.0106) and patient level (2.55+/-2.18 vs. 1.14+/-1.68, P=0.0079) comparisons. The mean pre-dose to post-dose change in CNR was greater for Gd-BOPTA (9.13+/-15.36) than Gd-DTPA (2.18+/-9.90), but the difference was only marginally significant (P=0.0779; 95% CI: -0.553, 14.454) because of wide variations of signal intensity between lesions. Similar findings were obtained for LBR and per cent enhancement. No differences between the agents were noted in terms of safety parameters. At an equivalent dose Gd-BOPTA is significantly better than Gd-DTPA for visualization of enhancing CNS tumours in paediatric patients.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Childhood Brain TumorsJournal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2002
- Detection of Intracranial MetastasesInvestigative Radiology, 2001
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Central Nervous System PathologyInvestigative Radiology, 2000
- Safety and Efficacy of Dotarem (Gd-DOTA) versus Magnevist (Gd-DTPA) in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Central Nervous SystemInvestigative Radiology, 1995
- Diagnostic role of gadolinium-DTPA in pediatric neuroradiologyNeuroradiology, 1992
- Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Suprasellar Tumors of ChildhoodPediatric Neurosurgery, 1991
- Magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents: theory and application to the central nervous systemJournal of Neurosurgery, 1990
- Comparison of plain and Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR-imaging in childrenPediatric Radiology, 1990
- MR Imaging of Pediatric Cerebral AbnormalitiesJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1985
- Primary brain tumors in childrenSeminars in Roentgenology, 1984