Total reconstruction of the vesico‐urethral junction
Top Cited Papers
- 5 March 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 101 (7) , 871-877
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.07424.x
Abstract
We describe a novel technique of total vesico-urethral reconstruction, which combines the tactics of previous surgeons, and compare the outcome of our innovative changes for return to early continence with prostatectomies with no or partial reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction. Between 1 January 2005 and 5 June 2007 a cohort of 700 patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy were prospectively evaluated. Patients in 2005 (214) served as a control group, they received no additional methods to provide support to the vesico-urethral junction; a standard anastomosis was made. Patients in 2006 (304) received an anterior reconstruction only, to provide additional vesico-urethral anastomotic support. Patients in 2007 (182) received the total reconstructive procedure, which included an anterior reconstruction and posterior reconstruction. Outcome data were collected using standardized health-related quality-of-life measures, which included the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite survey, International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function, and then re-verified by telephone interview with a standardized questionnaire. The follow-up intervals were 1, 6, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. Continence was defined as no pad usage or one small liner used for security purposes only. Baseline variables were also collected. The percentage of patients who had achieved continence in the control group were: 13%, 35%, 50%, 62% and 82% at the 1-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 52-week follow-up, respectively. The percentage of patients who had achieved continence in the anterior reconstruction group were 27%, 59%, 77%, 86%, and 91%, respectively. The total reconstruction group had continence rates of 38%, 83%, 91%, and 97% at 1, 6, 12, and 24 weeks, respectively. At all the follow-up intervals the continence rate was significantly less in the control group than in the anterior reconstruction group and the total reconstruction group (P < 0.01). The total reconstruction procedure is a safe and effective way to achieve an early return to continence. No adverse effects have been observed because of its employment and our data validates that it does provide a statistically significant early return to continence compared with no reconstructive efforts or with only anterior reconstructive efforts.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomyBJU International, 2008
- Anatomic Restoration Technique of Continence Mechanism and Preservation of Puboprostatic Collar: A Novel Modification to Achieve Early Urinary Continence in Men Undergoing Robotic ProstatectomyUrology, 2007
- Preservation of the Puboprostatic Collar and Puboperineoplasty for Early Recovery of Urinary Continence after Robotic Prostatectomy: Anatomic Basis and Preliminary OutcomesEuropean Urology, 2007
- Prospective health-related quality-of-life assessment in an initial cohort of patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomyUrology, 2006
- Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter Allows a Rapid Recovery of Continence after Transperitoneal Videolaparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2006
- Anatomical foundations and surgical manoeuvres for precise identification of the prostatovesical junction during robotic radical prostatectomyBJU International, 2006
- Identification of the retrotrigonal layer as a key anatomical landmark during robotically assisted radical prostatectomyBJU International, 2006
- The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri‐zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve‐sparing prostatectomyBJU International, 2006
- Restoration of Posterior Aspect of Rhabdosphincter Shortens Continence Time After Radical Retropubic ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 2006
- Urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the outcome of a surgical techniqueBJU International, 2003