Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation during handgrip exercise: evidence for endothelial transduction of the mean shear stimulus
Open Access
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Physiological Society in American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Vol. 294 (6) , H2669-H2679
- https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01372.2007
Abstract
Exercise elevates shear stress in the supplying conduit artery. Although this is the most relevant physiological stimulus for flow-mediated dilation (FMD), the fluctuating pattern of shear that occurs may influence the shear stress-FMD stimulus response relationship. This study tested the hypothesis that the brachial artery FMD response to a step increase in shear is influenced by the fluctuating characteristics of the stimulus, as evoked by forearm exercise. In 16 healthy subjects, we examined FMD responses to step increases in shear rate in three conditions: stable shear upstream of heat-induced forearm vasodilation (FHStable); fluctuating shear upstream of heat-induced forearm vasodilation and rhythmic forearm cuff inflation/deflation (FHFluctuating); and fluctuating shear upstream of exercise-induced forearm vasodilation (FEStep Increase). The mean increase in shear rate (±SD) was the same in all trials (FHFluctuating: 51.69 ± 15.70 s−1; FHStable: 52.16 ± 14.10 s−1; FEStep Increase: 50.14 ± 13.03 s−1 P = 0.131). However, the FHFluctuating and FEStep Increase trials resulted in a fluctuating shear stress stimulus with rhythmic high and low shear periods that were 96.18 ± 24.54 and 11.80 ± 7.30 s−1, respectively. The initial phase of FMD (phase I) was followed by a second, delayed-onset FMD and was not different between conditions (phase I: FHFluctuating: 5.63 ± 2.15%; FHStable: 5.33 ± 1.85%; FEStep Increase: 5.30 ± 2.03%; end-trial: FHFluctuating: 7.76 ± 3.40%; FHStable: 7.00 ± 3.03%; FEStep Increase: 6.68 ± 3.04%; P = 0.196). Phase I speed also did not differ ( P = 0.685). In conclusion, the endothelium transduced the mean shear when exposed to shear fluctuations created by a typical handgrip protocol. Muscle activation did not alter the FMD response. Forearm exercise may provide a viable technique to investigate brachial artery FMD in humans.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Crucial Role of NO and Endothelium-Derived Hyperpolarizing Factor in Human Sustained Conduit Artery Flow-Mediated DilatationHypertension, 2006
- Effect of acute sympathetic nervous system activation on flow-mediated dilation of brachial arteryAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2006
- Effect of acute and chronic ascorbic acid on flow‐mediated dilatation with sedentary and physically active human ageingThe Journal of Physiology, 2004
- Conduction of hyperpolarization along hamster feed arteries: augmentation by acetylcholineAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2002
- Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial arteryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Regulation of skeletal muscle perfusion during exerciseActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1998
- Sympathetic vasoconstriction in active skeletal muscles during dynamic exerciseJournal of Applied Physiology, 1997
- Direct coupling between blood flow and metabolism at the capillary level in striated muscleAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 1997
- Technical aspects of evaluating brachial artery vasodilatation using high-frequency ultrasoundAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 1995
- Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosisThe Lancet, 1992