Deep tectal cells in pigeons respond to kinematograms
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Comparative Physiology A
- Vol. 162 (5) , 639-647
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01342639
Abstract
Deep tectal neurons in pigeons respond selectively to moving visual stimuli, and are inhibited by large background patterns moved in-phase with these stimuli. In this investigation we demonstrate that these same deep tectal neurons respond equally well to kinematograms as they do to traditional luminance contrast stimuli typically employed in visual experiments. Computer generated kinematograms, the motion domain equivalents of random dot stereograms, were used as stimuli in these experiments. These kinematograms, where a small centrally located set of random dots is moved coherently in one direction while the remaining dots are moved in a different direction, thus constitute a pure motion stimulus where the stimulus form is only visible in the dynamic pattern, but does not exist on any single frame. Both ‘object’ configured and ‘hole’ configured kinematograms were employed; the former appearing as regions of texture moving over, or in front of, the background texture, while the latter appear as windows through which a more distant textured surface is revealed. Extracellular recordings from isolated deep tectal cells showed that all units responded in a very similar manner whether the stimulus was an ‘object’ configured kinematogram or the more traditional luminance contrast variety. This similarity included directional selectivity, the in-phase inhibition anti-phase facilitation effect, and sensitivity to opposed motion independent of direction. However, when the kinematograms were configured as ‘holes’ none of the units tested responded to these stimuli. The significance of these observations for tectal functioning, image segmentation through motion and animal camouflage is discussed.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global visual processing in the monkey superior colliculusBrain Research, 1986
- Stimulus Specific Responses from Beyond the Classical Receptive Field: Neurophysiological Mechanisms for Local-Global Comparisons in Visual NeuronsAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 1985
- Three-dimensional object recognitionACM Computing Surveys, 1985
- Cryptic Movement in the Vine Snake Oxybelis aeneusIchthyology & Herpetology, 1985
- Single Visual Neurons Code Opposing Motion Independent of DirectionScience, 1983
- The interpretation of a moving retinal imageProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1980
- A neurophysiological determination of the vertical horopter in the cat and owlJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1979
- Moving background patterns alter directionally specific responses of pigeon tectal neuronsBrain Research, 1978
- Local structure of movement parallax of the planeJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1976
- Motorische Funktion des Tektal- und Tegmentalgebietes; pp. 1–26European Neurology, 1946