Role of transforming growth factor-βthe preferential induction of T helper cells of type 1 by staphylococcal enterotoxin B
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 23 (9) , 2306-2310
- https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830230938
Abstract
Stimulation of murine CD4+ T cells with staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) results in the preferential development of T helper (Th) 1 cells [i.e. high interferon (IFN)‐γ and low interleukin (IL)‐4, IL‐5 and IL‐10]; whereas in response to plate‐bound anti‐CD3 or anti‐T cell receptor‐αβ, Th1 as well as Th2 cells develop. In the present study, we examined the mechanism which is responsible for the selective Th1 development in the SEB system. The addition of IL‐4 resulted in a strong development of Th2 cells showing that SEB stimulation can result inTh2 differentiation. Co‐stimulation with anti‐CD28 was insufficient in this regard. Lack of Th2 development in the SEB system was in part due to the inhibitory effect of endogenously produced transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β), because anti‐TGF‐β allowed the development of Th2 cells. Similarly, TGF‐β inhibited Th2 development and stimulated Th1 development in the anti‐CD3 system. This shift was only partially prevented by also including IL‐4 in the cultures. The effects of TGF‐β could only partially be explained by stimulation of IFN‐γ or inhibition of IL‐4 as intermediatory cytokines: (1) TGF‐β stimulated Th1 development even in the presence of anti‐IL‐4 and anti‐IFN‐γ, and (2) a strong inhibitory effect of anti‐TGF‐β on Th1 development was still observed when anti‐IL‐4 and IFN‐γ were simultaneously added to the cultures. It is concluded that SEB favors Th1 development by stimulation of TGF‐β production. Inhibition of Th2 development by TGF‐β is due, in part, to inhibition of IL‐4 and stimulation of IFN‐γ, and, in part, to a direct effect of TGF‐β on the responding T cells.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Manipulation of the superantigen‐induced lymphokine response. Selective induction of interleukin‐10 or interferon‐γ synthesis in small resting CD4+ T cellsEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1993
- Differential effect of transforming growth factor β on the synthesis of Th1‐ and Th2‐like lymphokines by human T lymphocytesEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1992
- Strategies of Anti‐Cytokine Monoclonal Antibody Development: Immunoassay of IL‐10 and IL‐5 in Clinical SamplesImmunological Reviews, 1992
- Interleukin (IL)‐4 production by human T cells: differential regulation of IL‐4 vs. IL‐2 productionEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1992
- Generation of interleukin 4 (IL-4)-producing cells in vivo and in vitro: IL-2 and IL-4 are required for in vitro generation of IL-4-producing cells.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1990
- Activation of Polyphosphoinositide Hydrolysis in T Cells by H-2 Alloantigen But Not MLS DeterminantsScience, 1990
- Cure of murine leishmaniasis with anti-interleukin 4 monoclonal antibody. Evidence for a T cell-dependent, interferon gamma-independent mechanism.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1990
- TH1 and TH2 Cells: Different Patterns of Lymphokine Secretion Lead to Different Functional PropertiesAnnual Review of Immunology, 1989
- Reciprocal expression of interferon gamma or interleukin 4 during the resolution or progression of murine leishmaniasis. Evidence for expansion of distinct helper T cell subsets.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1989
- Two types of mouse helper T cell clone. III. Further differences in lymphokine synthesis between Th1 and Th2 clones revealed by RNA hybridization, functionally monospecific bioassays, and monoclonal antibodies.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1987