The behavioural economics of climate change
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Oxford Review of Economic Policy
- Vol. 24 (2) , 280-297
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn012
Abstract
This paper attempts to bring some central insights from behavioural economics into the economics of climate change. In particular, it discusses (i) implications of prospect theory, the equity premium puzzle, and time-inconsistent preferences in the choice of discount rate used in climate-change cost assessments, and (ii) the implications of various kinds of social preferences for the outcome of climate negotiations. Several reasons are presented for why it appears advisable to choose a substantially lower social discount rate than the average return on investments. It also seems likely that taking social preferences into account increases the possibilities of obtaining international agreements, compared to the standard model. However, there are also effects going in the opposite direction, and the importance of sanctions is emphasized.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subjective Expectations and Asset-Return PuzzlesAmerican Economic Review, 2007
- The Expert MindScientific American, 2006
- The Competitive Advantage of Sanctioning InstitutionsScience, 2006
- What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator gamesPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Libertarian PaternalismAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- Evaluation Periods and Asset Prices in a Market ExperimentThe Journal of Finance, 2003
- Environmental Information Disclosure Programs: They Work, but Why?Social Science Quarterly, 2002
- A Fine is a PriceThe Journal of Legal Studies, 2000
- Heart and Mind in Conflict: the Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision MakingJournal of Consumer Research, 1999
- First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory BiasThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999