Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: too many rights make a wrong?
Open Access
- 2 October 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Nature in Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
- Vol. 3 (1) , 14
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-3-14
Abstract
Individuals might reasonably expect the freedom to make their own decisions regarding their health. However, what happens when an individual's wishes conflict with what is in that individual's best interests? How far should an individual's rights be restricted for his or her own benefit? Similarly, what limitations should be placed on an individual's behaviour when that person's wishes go against what is good for the population in general? Here we discuss the issues that can arise when the rights of individuals conflict with individual and population benefits in relation to infectious diseases.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individual freedoms versus collective responsibility: immunization decision-making in the face of occasionally competing valuesEmerging Themes in Epidemiology, 2006
- Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an economic epidemiology perspectiveEmerging Themes in Epidemiology, 2006
- Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an ethicist's perspectiveEmerging Themes in Epidemiology, 2006
- The Run on Tamiflu — Should Physicians Prescribe on Demand?New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Individual Rights versus the Public's Health — 100 Years afterJacobsonv.MassachusettsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Evaluation of Control Measures Implemented in the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak in Beijing, 2003JAMA, 2003
- Transmission Dynamics of the Etiological Agent of SARS in Hong Kong: Impact of Public Health InterventionsScience, 2003
- MMR Vaccine: Review of Benefits and RisksJournal of Infection, 2002
- Adaptation and Natural SelectionJournal of Animal Ecology, 1968