Economic performance and political mobility: Chinese provincial leaders
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Contemporary China
- Vol. 5 (12) , 135-154
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10670569608724246
Abstract
Chinese provincial leaders, unlike their counterparts in a democratic system, are not elected but selected. Hence the criteria by which the center uses to select and retain provincial leaders would be critical for the political mobility of provincial leaders. As China has been a developmental state since 1949, it is not unreasonable to expect that the center would retain or promote or demote provincial leaders according to the economic performance of their provinces. To test the hypothesis, I conducted multinomial regressions with a data set of Chinese provincial leaders between 1949 and 1994 in thirty provincial units. As the results show, the political mobility of provincial leaders is determined not only by the political movements of the PRC but also by the economic performance of the provincial leaders. The worse the economic performance record the more likely the provincial leader will be demoted. Moreover, the revenue contributions of the province during the provincial leader's tenure are also a determinant of the political mobility of the provincial leader.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Studies of Central–Provincial Relations in the People's Republic of China: A Mid-Term AppraisalThe China Quarterly, 1995
- The Political Logic of Economic Reform in ChinaPublished by University of California Press ,1993
- Retirement of Revolutionaries in ChinaPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1993
- From Revolutionary Cadres to Party Technocrats in Socialist ChinaPublished by University of California Press ,1991
- Localism in Presidential Elections: The Home State AdvantageAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1983