Review article: Helicobacter pylori eradication–understandable caution but no excuse for inertia
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 8 (4) , 369-389
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.1994.tb00304.x
Abstract
The long-term management of patients with peptic ulcer disease is unsatisfactory, as judged by the persistently high levels of haemorrhage, perforation and death from this condition in Western countries. Although ulcer recurrence and complications can be prevented, many patients with peptic ulcer disease fail to receive the benefits of modern therapeutic regimens. In recent years, eradication of Helicobactor pylori has been promoted as a‘cure’for peptic ulcer disease and, while such claims are premature, there can be little doubt that this treatment–when successful– dramatically improves the medium-term prognosis of ulcer patients. However, in general, clinicians have given this promising therapeutic advance a lukewarm welcome. The aim of this detailed review of the literature is to remove the uncertainty and confusion surrounding many aspects of eradication therapy. Estimates are provided of the eradication rates after either triple therapy or the combination of omeprazole plus amoxycillin, and the sources of variation in published studies are discussed. Problems associated with eradication therapy, including side effects, compliance and re-infection, are addressed in order to ascertain the extent and clinical significance of each factor. In addition, studies reporting the outcome of patients with peptic ulcer disease after eradication are assessed with reference to both ulcer recurrence and complications. The result of the review is to dissipate much of the scepticism concerning eradication therapy. However, whilst acknowledging the efficacy of eradication therapy, its limitations have also to be recognized. By itself, it does not provide the complete answer to peptic ulcer disease. For some ulcer patients, eradication therapy is the preferred option; for others, prophylactic therapy with H2-receptor antagonists is more suitable. Guidelines are proposed for the selection of patients for each alternative therapy. The crucial point is that patients with peptic ulcer–excluding the small proportion with a mild form of the disease—require positive, long-term management consisting of either continuous prophylaxis with H2-receptor antagonists or the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pharmaco‐economic considerations in the long‐term management of peptic ulcer diseaseAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1993
- Galenical formulations of amoxicillin/clavulanate and eradication of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer patientsEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 1993
- Amoxicillin plus omeprazoleEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 1993
- Review article: maintenance treatment with H2‐receptor antagonists for peptic ulcer diseaseAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1992
- Short report: short‐term triple therapy for H. pylori‐associated duodenal ulcer diseaseAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1992
- Eradicating Helicobacter pylori and symptoms of non-ulcer dyspepsia.BMJ, 1991
- Long term serological surveillance after treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.Gut, 1991
- Incidence of Perforated and Bleeding Peptic Ulcers before and after the Introduction of H2-Receptor AntagonistsAnnals of Surgery, 1988
- Upper gastrointestinal bleedingDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1981
- Morphological, Functional and Immunological State of the Gastric Mucosa in Gastric Carcinoma FamiliesScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1979