QT Dispersion Does Not Represent Electrocardiographic Interlead Heterogeneity of Ventricular Repolarization
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 11 (8) , 835-843
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2000.tb00061.x
Abstract
QT Dispersion and Repolarization Heterogeneity. Introduction: QT dispersion (QTd, range of QT intervals in 12 ECG leads) is thought to reflect spatial heterogeneity of ventricular refractoriness. However, QTd may be largely due to projections of the repolarization dipole rather than “nondipolar” signals. Methods and Results: Seventy‐eight normal subjects (47 ± 16 years, 23 women), 68 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients (HCM; 38 ± 15 years. 21 women), 72 dilated cardiomyopathy patients (DCM; 48 ± 15 years, 29 women), and 81 survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI; 63 ± 12 years, 20 women) had digital 12‐lead resting supine ECGs recorded (10 ECGs recorded in each subject and results averaged). In each ECG lead, QT interval was measured under operator review by QT Guard (GE Marquette) to obtain QTd. QTd was expressed as the range, standard deviation, and highest‐to‐lowest quartile difference of QT interval in all measurable leads. Singular value decomposition transferred ECGs into a minimum dimensional time orthogonal space. The first three components represented the ECG dipole; other components represented nondipolar signals. The power of the T wave nondipolar within the total components was computed to measure spatial repolarization heterogeneity (relative T wave residuum, TWR). OTd was 33.6 ± 18.3, 47.0 ± 19.3, 34.8 ± 21.2, and 57.5 ± 25.3 msec in normals, HCM, CM, and AMI, respectively (normals vs DCM: NS, other P < 0.009). TWR was 0.029%± 0.031%, 0.067%± 0.067%, 0.112%± 0.154%, and 0.186%± 0.308% in normals, HCM, DCM, and AMI (HCM vs DCM: NS. other P < 0.006), The correlations between QTd and TWR were r = ‐0.0446, 0.2805, ‐0.1531, and 0.0771 (P = 0.03 for HCM, other NS) in normals, HCM, DCM, and AMI, respectively. Conclusion: Spatial heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization exists and is measurable in 12‐lead resting ECGs. It differs between different clinical groups, but the so‐called QT dispersion is unrelated to it.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of QT Dispersion for Prediction of Mortality or Arrhythmic Events After Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 1998
- QTc Dispersion Predicts Cardiac Mortality in the ElderlyCirculation, 1998
- Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the Definition and Classification of CardiomyopathiesCirculation, 1996
- Proarrhythmia with Class III Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Definition, Electrophysiologic Mechanisms, Incidence, Predisposing Factors, and Clinical ImplicationsJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1995
- Electrocardiographic indexes of dispersion of ventricular repolarization: An isolated heart validation studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Adjustment of QT dispersion assessed from 12 lead electrocardiograms for different numbers of analysed electrocardiographic leads: comparison of stability of different methods.Heart, 1994
- Dispersion of the QT interval. A marker of therapeutic efficacy in the idiopathic long QT syndrome.Circulation, 1994
- Quantitative analysis of T wave abnormalities and their prognostic implications in the idiopathic long QT syndromeJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- QT dispersion: an indication of arrhythmia risk in patients with long QT intervals.Heart, 1990