A Randomized Study Comparing Retroperitoneal Drainage with No Drainage after Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Malignancies
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Gynecologic Oncology
- Vol. 65 (3) , 478-482
- https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1997.4648
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Closed-Suction Drainage versus No Drainage Following Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Stage IB Cervical CancerGynecologic Oncology, 1995
- A new transabdominal approach to the left retroperitoneum for systematic removal of lymph nodes left of the aorta in gynecologic malignanciesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1994
- To Drain or Not To Drain: A Retrospective Study of Closed-Suction Drainage Following Radical Hysterectomy with Pelvic LymphadenectomyGynecologic Oncology, 1993
- Radical Hysterectomy: A Randomized Study Comparing Two Techniques for Resection of the Cardinal LigamentGynecologic Oncology, 1993
- Technique and feasibility of radical para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies: a prospective studyInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 1991
- Pelvic and paraaortic lymphocysts after radical surgery because of cervical and ovarian cancerAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Pelvic lymphocyst—A 10-year experienceGynecologic Oncology, 1988
- Closed suction pelvic drainage after radical pelvic surgical proceduresAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1986
- Large Lymphoceles Resulting from Retroperitoneal LymphadenectomyJournal of Urology, 1980
- Lymphocysts: A complication of radical pelvic surgeryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1959