Characterization of vasodilatory adenosine receptors in equine digital veins

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Isolated equine digital veins (EDVs) which had been denuded of their endothelium were used to study adenosine receptors causing vasodilation. When the blood vessel wall tension was raised with the thromboxanemimetic, U44069 (30 nm), the order of vasodilator potency of adenosine receptor agonists was: 5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) > 2‐p‐(2‐carboxyethyl)phenyl amino‐5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamido‐adenosine (CGS 21680) > 5′‐N‐methylcarboxamido‐adenosine (MECA) > > N6‐cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) > N6‐cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) > N6–2‐(4‐Aminophenyl)ethyladenosine (APNEA) > adenosine. Removal of the endothelium had no significant effect on the responses to NECA. The adenosine receptor antagonists, 8‐cyclopentyl‐1,3‐dipropylxanthine (DPCPX; A1‐selective) and xanthine amine cogener (XAC; non‐selective antagonist) inhibited responses to NECA and CHA in a competitive manner and XAC proved to be 8–25 times more potent than DPCPX against both agonists. These data support the presence of A2adenosine receptors in EDVs, located on the vascular smooth muscle cells, which are most likely to be of the A2A‐adenosine receptor subtype. A direct comparison between the potency and efficacy of NECA and adenosine as vasodilators of EDV and equine digital arteries was made and both agonists proved to be significantly more potent and efficacious as vasodilators of EDVs. These data suggest that adenosine may be an important local mediator regulating blood flow through the digital circulation and that its generation under hypoxic conditions would lead to selective venodilation.