Assessing and comparing costs: how robust are the bootstrap and methods based on asymptotic normality?
- 3 April 2002
- journal article
- costing methodology
- Published by Wiley in Health Economics
- Vol. 12 (1) , 33-49
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.699
Abstract
This article addresses and challenges some common perceptions in the statistical assessment of costs and cost‐effectiveness in health economics. Cost data typically exhibit highly skew distributions. Two techniques whose validity does not depend on any specific form of underlying distribution are the bootstrap and methods based on asymptotic normality of sample means. These methods are generally thought to be appropriate for the analysis of cost data.We argue that, even when these methods are technically valid, they may often lead to inefficient and even misleading inferences. It is important to apply methods that recognise the skewness in cost data.We further demonstrate that it may also be important to incorporate relevant prior information in a Bayesian analysis. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bayesian cost‐effectiveness analysis from clinical trial dataStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrapStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- Randomised comparison of the effectiveness and costs of community and hospital based mental health services for children with behaviouralBMJ, 2000
- How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?BMJ, 2000
- Inference for the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and cost-effectiveness ratio.PharmacoEconomics, 2000
- Bayesian Nonparametric Inference for Random Distributions and Related FunctionsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1999
- A 1-Year Comparison of Turbuhaler vs Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler in Asthmatic PatientsChest, 1996
- The Bayesian BootstrapThe Annals of Statistics, 1981
- A note on criterion robustness and inference robustnessBiometrika, 1964