Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care
- 10 May 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 273 (18) , 1439-1444
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520420055038
Abstract
Objective. —To evaluate the effects of a restrictive and a liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy on mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients. Study Design. —Multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Patient Population. —Sixty-nine normovolemic critically ill patients admitted to one of five tertiary level intensive care units with hemoglobin values less than 90 g/L within 72 hours of admission. Interventions. —Patients were randomly allocated to one of two RBC transfusion strategies. Hemoglobin values were maintained between 100 and 120 g/L in the liberal transfusion group and between 70 and 90 g/L in the restrictive group. Results. —Primary diagnosis and mean±SD age (58.6±15 vs 59.0±21 years) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (20±6.2 vs 21 ±7.2) were similar in the restrictive and liberal groups, respectively. Daily hemoglobin values averaged 90 g/L in the restrictive group vs 109 g/L in the liberal group (P<.001). The restrictive group received 2.5 U per patient compared with 4.8 U per patient in the liberal group. This represents a 48% relative decrease (P<.001) in RBC units transfused per patient. The 30-day mortality rate was 24% in the restrictive group compared with 25% in the liberal group; the 95% confidence interval around the absolute difference was −19% to 21%. Similar observations were noted for intensive care unit mortality (P=.76) and 120-day mortality (P>.99). In addition, survival analysis comparing time until death in both groups did not reveal any significant difference (P=.93) between groups. Organ dysfunction scores were also similar (P=.44). Conclusion. —In this small randomized trial, neither mortality nor the development of organ dysfunction was affected by the transfusion strategy, which suggests that a more restrictive approach to the transfusion of RBCs may be safe in critically ill patients. However, the study lacked power to detect small but clinically significant differences. Therefore, further investigations of RBC transfusion strategies are warranted. (JAMA. 1995;273:1439-1444)Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Scoring System for Multiple Organ Dysfunction SyndromePublished by Springer Nature ,1994
- A Simple Multiple System Organ Failure Scoring System Predicts Mortality of Patients Who Have Sepsis SyndromeChest, 1993
- Perioperative haemotherapy: I. Indications for blood component transfusionCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1992
- Elevation of Cardiac Output and Oxygen Delivery Improves Outcome in Septic ShockChest, 1992
- Prudent Strategies for Elective Red Blood Cell TransfusionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Collection and Transfusion of Blood in the United States, 1982–1988New England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Myocardial function in sepsis and endotoxin shockAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 1989
- Changing patterns of blood transfusions in four sets of United States hospitals, 1980 to 1985Transfusion, 1988
- Perioperative Red Blood Cell TransfusionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- The Effects of Vasodilation with Prostacyclin on Oxygen Delivery and Uptake in Critically Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987