Differential Attrition
- 1 December 1983
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 7 (6) , 831-840
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8300700607
Abstract
The differential attrition of persons from comparison groups severely restricts the inferences that can be made from results of evaluative research. This problem is particularly troublesome in the evaluation of medical technologies, such as coronary artery bypass graft surgery, since a substantial percentage of medical or control patients cross over to the surgical group. A procedure using worst case assumptions is developed that allows researchers to estimate the maximum effect of differential attrition, and therefore enhance the quality of their inferences. The article first illustrates theprocedure, then concludes with a discussion of the generality of the estimation procedure to other instances in which differential attrition is a problem, and points out the limitations of the approach.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- European coronary surgery study.Circulation, 1982
- The Anturane Reinfarction Trial: Reevaluation of OutcomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trialsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982
- National Institutes of Health Consensus-Development Conference StatementNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Attrition Bias in Experimental and Panel Data: The Gary Income Maintenance ExperimentEconometrica, 1979
- Differential attrition: Another hazard of follow-up research.American Psychologist, 1978
- A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects.American Psychologist, 1978
- Toward a Causal Model Approach for Adjusting for Preexisting Differences in the Nonequivalent Control Group SituationEvaluation Quarterly, 1977
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and designBritish Journal of Cancer, 1976
- A quasi-experimental approach to assessing treatment effects in the nonequivalent control group design.Psychological Bulletin, 1975