Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 77 (1) , 51-59
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00242-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experiencePublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
- Relative macrosomia identified by the individualised birthweight ratio (IBR): A better method of identifying the at risk fetusActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1994
- Must Macrosomic Fetuses be Delivered by a Caesarean Section? A Review of Outcome for 786 Babies ≥ 4,500 gAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Relationship Between Normal Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Women at Risk for Gestational Diabetes and Large for Gestational Age InfantsDiabetes Care, 1991
- Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing ≥4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- The influence of maternal weight, smoking, vascular complications and glucose regulation on the birth weight of infants of type 1 diabetic womenEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1991
- A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcome in patients with gestational diabetesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes and Macrosomic Newborns in a Mexican PopulationDiabetes Care, 1988
- Mother's birth weight as a predictor of macrosomiaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- The large infantAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1969