Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Atherosclerotic Internal Carotid Stenosis as the Noninvasive Imaging Modality in Revascularization Decision Making
Open Access
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 34 (3) , 660-664
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000057462.02141.6f
Abstract
Background and Purpose— In patients with severe internal carotid artery stenoses, thromboendarterectomy significantly reduces both ischemic stroke and the risk of more ischemic attacks. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the accepted preoperative test to determine whether a high-grade stenosis is present and requires surgical therapy. However, DSA has a procedural risk of stroke between 0.7% and 1%. An accurate, noninvasive imaging protocol with no risk of severe complications would significantly increase the benefit of surgical treatment. The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) in detecting and grading internal carotid artery stenoses and (2) to assess the misclassification rate of vessels suitable for revascularization by CEMRA. Methods— Ninety-two patients with sonographic evidence of neck vessel stenosis were enrolled in the study. All patients were submitted to CEMRA and DSA. CEMRA images were evaluated for the presence of mild, moderate, or severe stenosis and occlusion. Results— Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 97%, 82%, and 92.5%, respectively. Agreement with DSA was optimal at κ=0.87. The misclassification rate of CEMRA was 3.1% because of its tendency to overestimate the stenosis. Conclusions— The high diagnostic accuracy and limited misclassification rate suggest that CEMRA can be considered a powerful tool for the preoperative, noninvasive evaluation of atherosclerotic pathology of carotid arteries.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic reviewBMJ, 2002
- Kontrastverstärkte dreidimensionale MR-Angiographie der A. carotis bei 1,0 Tesla im Vergleich zuri.a. DSA - ist die Methode für die Diagnostik von Karotisstenosen geeignet?RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2001
- Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in the assessment of subclavian artery diseasesEuropean Radiology, 2000
- Contrast-enhanced MR angiography in patients with carotid artery stenosis: comparison of two different techniques with an unenhanced 2D time-of-flight sequenceNeuroradiology, 2000
- Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the craniocervical vessels: a reviewNeuroradiology, 1999
- Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Moderate or Severe StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- MR-based assessment of vascular morphology and functionEuropean Radiology, 1998
- Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients — Is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysisJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1995
- Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.Radiology, 1992
- Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991