Comparison of Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Restenosis or Clinical Adverse Events
Open Access
- 15 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 95 (12) , 1409-1414
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.01.096
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World”Circulation, 2004
- Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS)The Lancet, 2003
- A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Standard Stent for Coronary RevascularizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control groupStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- A profile of candidates for repeat myocardial revascularization: Implications for selection of treatmentThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987