Rhetoric, the sophists, and the possible
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 51 (3) , 215-226
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390196
Abstract
This essay argues that the rhetoric of the Sophists exhibits a distinct preference for the world of possibility. As such, it is different from Aristotle's rhetoric, which privileges the world of actuality. After showing how this is so, the essay compares the sophistical and the Aristotelian versions of rhetoric by discussing their respective implications for language and persuasion. The conclusion reached is that the Aristotelian version, although textually and topically more complete, is not superior to but merely different from the sophistical.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heidegger and the PossiblePhilosophical Studies, 1980
- Gorgias et le pouvoir de la poésieThe Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1973
- Gorgias and the Psychology of the LogosHarvard Studies in Classical Philology, 1962
- AristotlePublished by Columbia University Press ,1960
- MenoPublished by Harvard University Press ,1924
- ProtagorasPublished by Harvard University Press ,1924