The accuracy of various tests for bacterial vaginosis in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review
- 19 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 111 (5) , 409-422
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00124.x
Abstract
To determine the accuracy with which various types of tests for bacterial vaginosis predict spontaneous preterm birth in pregnant women.Studies were identified without language restrictions through nine different databases, and manual searching of bibliographies of known primary and review articles.There are four different bacterial vaginosis testing methods: Gram staining tests using either Nugent's or Spiegel's criteria, and gas liquid chromatography are laboratory based, and the fourth method uses clinical (Amsel's) criteria to diagnose bacterial vaginosis. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on their characteristics, quality and accuracy. Accuracy data were used to form 2 x 2 contingency tables of the bacterial vaginosis test results with spontaneous preterm birth as the reference standard.Data on asymptomatic women and women with symptoms of threatened preterm labour were analysed separately. Data were pooled to produce summary estimates of likelihood ratios for positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) test results for the various types of tests.There were 18 primary articles, involving altogether 17,868 women. There was unexplained heterogeneity in the meta-analyses of the accuracy results, which requires caution in their interpretation. Meta-analyses of studies testing asymptomatic women in the second trimester showed that clinical criteria had a LR+ of 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.6) and a LR- of 1.00 (0.93 to 1.1), Gram staining (Nugent's criteria) had a LR+ of 1.6 (1.4 to 1.9) and a LR- of 0.9 (0.8 to 0.9), and Gram staining (Spiegel's criteria) had a LR+ of 2.4 (1.4 to 4.9) and a LR- of 0.81 (0.64 to 1.0). Among symptomatic women, Gram staining (Spiegel's criteria) had a LR+ of 1.3 (1.0 to 1.6) and LR- of 0.9 (0.7 to 1.0).There was a lack of difference in the accuracy of the various bacterial vaginosis tests for predicting preterm birth in both asymptomatic and symptomatic women of threatened preterm labour.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysisBMJ, 2001
- Cognitive status, language attainment, and prereading skills of 6‐year‐old very preterm children and their peers: the Bavarian Longitudinal StudyDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1999
- Spontaneous recovery of bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy is not associated with an improved perinatal outcomeActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1998
- Bacterial vaginosis and associated infections in pregnancyInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1996
- Intravaginal clindamycin treatment for bacterial vaginosis: Effects on preterm delivery and low birth weightAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- The preterm prediction study: Significance of vaginal infectionsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1994
- Vaginal Bacteroides Species Are Associated with an Increased Rate of Preterm Delivery among Women in Preterm LaborThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Maternal Gonococcal Infection as a Preventable Risk Factor for Low Birth WeightThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1990
- Anaerobic Bacteria in Nonspecific VaginitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980