Evidence that thesame-different disparity in letter matching is not attributable to response bias
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 34 (1) , 72-76
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03205898
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Null effects of exposure duration and heterogeneity of difference on thesame-different disparity in letter matchingPerception & Psychophysics, 1983
- Reinstating the original principles of Proctor's unified theory for matching-task phenomena: An evaluation of Krueger and Shapiro's reformulation.Psychological Review, 1983
- Probing Proctor's priming principle: The effect of simultaneous and sequential presentation on same-different judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1983
- On the “misguided” use of reaction-time differences: A discussion of Ratcliff and Hacker (1981)Perception & Psychophysics, 1982
- Response competition effects insame-different judgmentsPerception & Psychophysics, 1982
- Aparametric investigation of multiletter matchesPerception & Psychophysics, 1981
- Speed and accuracy of same and different responses in perceptual matchingPerception & Psychophysics, 1981
- A theory of perceptual matching.Psychological Review, 1978
- Effect of identity in the multiletter matching task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976
- Judgments of Sameness and Difference: Experiments on Decision TimeScience, 1965