Robustness of Fishbein's Theory of Reasoned Action in Predicting Food‐Related Behavior
- 1 September 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Home Economics Research Journal
- Vol. 15 (1) , 52-56
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727x8601500106
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify differences in the relations among the components of Fishbein's theory of reasoned action across two populations— college and community samples—when applied to a food‐related behavior (i.e., eating at a fast‐food hamburger restaurant). A total of 154 college students and 212 community respondents completed a questionnaire that measured the com ponents of the Fishbein model. Two weeks later, 104 (68%) of the college stu dents and 164 (77%) of the community respondents completed a follow‐up ques tionnaire which asked whether they had eaten at a fast‐food hamburger restau rant in the past two weeks. The relationships among the components of the model were examined and found robust across the two sample populations. This finding increases our confidence in the use of the Fishbein model as a predictor of eating at fast‐food hamburger restaurants.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Eating at Fast‐Food Restaurants: An Analysis Using Two Behavioral Intention ModelsJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 1983
- Eating at a fast-food restaurant — A social-psychological analysisJournal of Nutrition Education, 1983
- Emotional Conservatism: The Basis of Social Behavior?Contemporary Psychology, 1980
- Research by ConvenienceJournal of Consumer Research, 1977
- THE RELATION BETWEEN BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS AND BELIEFS: A PROBABILISTIC MODELHuman Communication Research, 1977