What is wrong with the new institutional economics (and what is still wrong with the old)?
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Review of Political Economy
- Vol. 1 (3) , 299-318
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09538258900000023
Abstract
It is one of the objectives of this paper to respond to the self-proclaimed superiority of the new institutionalists over the old. New institutionalists have found little of value in the old, largely dismissing its approach and its concerns in favour of a more purely individualistic approach and one emphasizing invisible-hand and evolutionary processes. Nevertheless, it is the argument of this paper that in terms of the development of an adequate treatment of institutions it is far from obvious that the NIE, if it remains so narrowly constituted, can provide more than a part. The emphasis of the OIE on particular institutional histories, collective decision-making processes, and institutional failures retains its place, even in the face of the self-assured assault of the new.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE PERCEPTION OF MAN AND THE CONCEPTION OF SOCIETY: TWO APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING SOCIETYEconomic Inquiry, 1987
- Spontaneous Market Order and Social RulesEconomics and Philosophy, 1986
- Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of EmbeddednessAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1985
- Thorstein Veblen and the Processes of Institutional ChangeHistory of Political Economy, 1984
- Microeconomics, Norms, and RationalityEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 1984
- On Austrian methodologySynthese, 1977
- Why Is the Common Law Efficient?The Journal of Legal Studies, 1977
- THE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL IS INCOMPLETE AND NOT ADEQUATE FOR THE RECONCILIATION OF MICRO AND MACROECONOMIC THEORYKyklos, 1975
- Institutional IndividualismBritish Journal of Sociology, 1975
- Methodological IndividualismBritish Journal of Sociology, 1960