Prognostic Relevance of Gene Amplifications and Coamplifications in Breast Cancer
Open Access
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Research
- Vol. 64 (23) , 8534-8540
- https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-1945
Abstract
Multiple different oncogenes have been described previously to be amplified in breast cancer including HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2. Gene amplification results in oncogene overexpression but may also serve as an indicator of genomic instability. As such, presence of one or several gene amplifications may have prognostic significance. To assess the prognostic importance of amplifications and coamplifications of HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2 in breast cancer, we analyzed a breast cancer tissue microarray containing samples from 2197 cancers with follow-up information. Fluorescence in situ hybridizations revealed amplifications of CCND1 in 20.1%, HER2 in 17.3%, MDM2 in 5.7%, MYC in 5.3%, and EGFR in 0.8% of the tumors. All gene amplifications were significantly associated with high grade. HER2 (P < 0.001) and MYC amplification (P < 0.001) were also linked to shortened survival. In case of HER2, this was independent of grade, pT, and pN categories. MYC amplification was almost 3 times more frequent in medullary cancer (15.9%), than in the histologic subtype with the second highest frequency (ductal; 5.6%; P = 0.0046). HER2 and MYC amplification were associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negativity (P < 0.001) whereas CCND1 amplification was linked to estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positivity (P < 0.001). Coamplifications were more prevalent than expected based on the individual frequencies. Coamplifications of one or several other oncogenes occurred in 29.6% of CCND1, 43% of HER2, 55.7% of MDM2, 65% of MYC, and 72.8% of EGFR-amplified cancers. HER2/MYC-coamplified cancers had a worse prognosis than tumors with only one of these amplifications. Furthermore, a gradual decrease of survival was observed with increasing number of amplifications. In conclusion, these data support a major prognostic impact of genomic instability as determined by a broad gene amplification survey in breast cancer.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- HER2 Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer: Poor Correlation Between Weak Positivity by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Amplification by Fluorescence In Situ HybridizationMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- Online Access to CGH Data of DNA Sequence Copy Number ChangesThe American Journal of Pathology, 2000
- AIB1, a Steroid Receptor Coactivator Amplified in Breast and Ovarian CancerScience, 1997
- mdm2 gene alterations and mdm2 protein expression in breast carcinomasThe Journal of Pathology, 1995
- Prognostic Association of C-Erbb-2 Oncogene Amplification and Protein Overexpression in Human Breast Cancer Using Archival Tissues a Comparative StudyActa Oncologica, 1994
- Amplification of c-erbB-2, int-2 and c-myc Genes in Node-Negative Breast Carcinomas: Relationship to PrognosisActa Oncologica, 1993
- Prevalence of amplification of the oncogenes c-myc, HER2/neu, and int-2 in one thousand human breast tumours: Correlation with steroid receptorsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1992
- c-myc gene amplification in selected node-negative breast cancer patients correlates with high rate of early relapseEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1992
- pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long‐term follow‐upHistopathology, 1991
- Epidermal growth factor receptors and prognosis in primary breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1990