A Story of Two Rocks
- 1 October 1977
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Geostandards Newsletter
- Vol. 1 (2) , 157-161
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908x.1977.tb00875.x
Abstract
An attempt is made to assess the impact that the investigation on reference (standard) rocks G‐1 and W‐1 has had on the geological fraternity. It is pointed out that prior to 1950, most geologists, petrologists, geochemists and the analysts themselves had a false impression of the quality of the data as obtained by classical methods of chemical analysis.As a result of the G‐1 W‐1 investigation, numerous other rock standards have been prepared, yet, despite the G‐1, W‐1 experience and the availability of several other reference rocks, progress on the improvement on data quality is often disappointingly slow.The G‐1, W‐1 investigation has had significant consequences for the development of geochemistry and the extra‐terrestrial chemistry; one example is given.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Summary of new data on rock samples G-1 and w-1 , 1962–1965Published by Elsevier ,2003
- “Standard Samples”: How “Standard” Are They?Geostandards Newsletter, 1977
- The composition of stony meteorites (V) some aspects of the composition of the basaltic achondritesEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 1969
- U.S. Geological survey standards—I. Additional data on rocks G-1 and W-1, 1965–1967Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1969
- A note on the relationship between the precision of classical methods of rock analysis and the concentration of each constituentMineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical Society, 1954
- The composition of the stone meteorites and the origin of the meteoritesGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1953