Gender and evidence-based planning: the CIET methods
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Development in Practice
- Vol. 16 (2) , 141-152
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520600562330
Abstract
Epidemiological combined with experiential evidence from communities can produce important and sometimes surprising insights into gender relations, to inform policies that address changing needs. CIET has standardised a community-based cross-design for the gender-sensitive collection and analysis of three types of evidence: impact, coverage, and costs. Five steps help to ensure that women's voices are heard in planning. Gender-stratified analysis of existing data is a starting point. Stratification of all responses by sex of the respondent prevents a numerical bias in favour of men translating into a gender bias in the analysis. Female focus groups inform survey design, interpretation, and appropriate strategies for change. Gender is a factor in risk and resilience analysis. Finally, gender-sensitive logistics ensure women's equal participation. First-order outputs include actionable gender data to advocate in favour of women. Second-order outputs include an enabling environment for equitable development, challenging the gendered patterns of economic marginalisation.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gender Planning and DevelopmentPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2012
- Social cost of land mines in four countries: Afghanistan, Bosnia, Cambodia, and MozambiqueBMJ, 1995
- Who pays for measles? The economic arguments for sustained immunizationHealth Policy and Planning, 1992
- The Epidemiology and Culture of ViolencePublished by Springer Nature ,1990