Choice in the context of informal care-giving
- 31 October 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Health & Social Care in the Community
- Vol. 15 (2) , 165-175
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00671.x
Abstract
Extending choice and control for social care service users is a central feature of current English policies. However, these have comparatively little to say about choice in relation to the informal carers of relatives, friends or older people who are disabled or sick. To explore the realities of choice as experienced by carers, the present paper reviews research published in English since 1985 about three situations in which carers are likely to face choices: receiving social services; the entry of an older person to long-term care; and combining paid work and care. Thirteen electronic databases were searched, covering both the health and social care fields. Databases included: ASSIA; IBSS; Social Care Online; ISI Web of Knowledge; Medline; HMIC Sociological Abstracts; INGENTA; ZETOC; and the National Research Register. The search strategy combined terms that: (1) identified individuals with care-giving responsibilities; (2) identified people receiving help and support; and (3) described the process of interest (e.g. choice, decision-making and self-determination). The search identified comparatively few relevant studies, and so was supplemented by the findings from another recent review of empirical research on carers' choices about combining work and care. The research evidence suggests that carers' choices are shaped by two sets of factors: one relates to the nature of the care-giving relationship; and the second consists of wider organisational factors. A number of reasons may explain the invisibility of choice for carers in current policy proposals for increasing choice. In particular, it is suggested that underpinning conceptual models of the relationship between carers and formal service providers shape the extent to which carers can be offered choice and control on similar terms to service users. In particular, the exercise of choice by carers is likely to be highly problematic if it involves relinquishing some unpaid care-giving activitiesKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of autonomy in explaining mental ill-health and depression among older people in long-term care settingsAgeing and Society, 2005
- Decision Making in Long-Term CareJournal of Gerontological Social Work, 2005
- ‘Making the best of things’: relatives' experiences of decisions about care-home entryAgeing and Society, 2003
- Rationed Care: Assessing the Support Needs of Informal Carers in English Social Services AuthoritiesJournal of Social Policy, 2002
- Older People and the Health–Social Care Boundary in the UK: Half a Century of Hidden Policy ConflictSocial Policy & Administration, 2001
- Economic and Psychological Benefits from Employment: The experiences and perspectives of mothers of disabled childrenDisability & Society, 1999
- Admission to care: facilitating role transition amongst family carersJournal of Clinical Nursing, 1997
- Families and the Institutionalized Elderly:Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 1997
- Entry to care: positive choice or fait accompli? Developing a more proactive nursing response to the needs of older people and their carers*Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1996
- Employment and `Community Care': Policies for the 1990sWork, Employment & Society, 1992