Zoladex and Flutamide Versus Orchiectomy in the Treatment of Advanced Prostatic Cancer
- 1 September 1990
- Vol. 66 (S5) , 1067-1073
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.1990.66.s5.1067
Abstract
A total of 591 patients with advanced prostatic cancer have been randomized to either orchiectomy or treatment with zoladex 3.6 mg as a depot preparation combined with flutamide 250 mg tid in two European studies, EORTC protocol 30853 and DAPROCA 86. Identical design and comparable patient characteristics in the two studies have allowed combined analysis. A small but statistically significant difference in time to objective progression or death from prostatic cancer was found in favor of the combination treatment. However, time from objective progression to death was longer in the group initially allocated to orchiectomy. Thus, no difference between treatment groups in overall survival was found. As a conclusion, the combined androgen blockade was not superior to orchiectomy in the treatment of patients with advanced prostatic cancer.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparability of EORTC and DAPROCA Studies in Advanced Prostatic CancerCancer, 1990
- ConclusionsCancer, 1990
- A Phase III Trial of Zoladex and Flutamide Versus Orchiectomy in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Carcinoma of the ProstateCancer, 1990
- A Controlled Trial of Leuprolide with and without Flutamide in Prostatic CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Multivariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Advanced Prostatic Cancer: Results from 2 European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer TrialsJournal of Urology, 1989
- Total Androgen Blockade for Metastatic Cancer of the ProstateAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1988
- Leuprolide versus Diethylstilbestrol for Metastatic Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958