Competition of Late-Emerging Weeds with Sugarbeets
- 1 January 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Weed Science
- Vol. 25 (2) , 168-170
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s004317450003318x
Abstract
Weed-free sugarbeets [Beta vulgaris (L.) Beauv.] growing at a spacing of 60 cm (1/2 stand) yielded the same weight of roots as those spaced 30 cm (full stand), and those spaced 90 cm (1/3 stand) yielded about 90% as much. Gross sucrose yield was reduced somewhat more, because the larger roots growing in partial stands contained a lower percentage of sucrose than the roots in full stands. Annual weeds that emerged after July 1 were suppressed and. killed by competition from sugarbeets of normal vigor in a full stand, but became competitive when the sugarbeets were spaced at 1/2 or 1/3 of a full stand. Competition from barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.] and pigweed (mixture of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and A. powellii S. Wats.), which reached a height of 150 cm, reduced root yields 5 to 39% in 1/2 stands and 19 to 49% in 1/3 stands, as compared with weed-free sugarbeets in the same stands. Hairy nightshade (Solarium sarachoides Sendt.) was abundant but never became taller than the sugarbeets. Its competition had no measurable effect on the sugarbeets.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Sugarbeet Root Losses Based on Kochia DensitiesWeed Science, 1973
- Competition Between Sugarbeets and Five Densities of KochiaWeed Science, 1971
- Competition Between Kochia and SugarbeetsWeed Science, 1969
- Some aspects of competition for light in potatoes and sugar beetThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1967
- Influence of Weed Competition on Sugar BeetsWeeds, 1967
- Competition between Irrigated Sugar Beets and Annual WeedsWeeds, 1965
- Competition of Annual Weeds and Sugar BeetsWeeds, 1965