Ethnicity as Practice? A Comment on Bentley
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Comparative Studies in Society and History
- Vol. 33 (1) , 158-168
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s001041750001690x
Abstract
Confronted with the reality of cargo cults, postcolonial politics, disunited working classes, and the United Nations seminars on racism, theorists of different persuasions have found themselves in the last twenty years having to explain—or explain away—ethnic phenomena. In his recent article in this journal (CSSH 29:1, 24–55), G. Carter Bentley1 points out the deficiencies in the two pervading schools of thought on ethnicity and fruitfully advocates applying Bourdieu's concepts of “practice” and “habitus” to the study of ethnicity. This appropriation of Bourdieu's concept of the habitus to the study of ethnicity is surely innovative, and Bentley argues effectively that we should look at practice for an objective “handle” on ethnicity. Nevertheless, Bentley's approach suffers for two reasons.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Class Act: Anthropology and the Race to Nation Across Ethnic TerrainAnnual Review of Anthropology, 1989
- How Societies RememberPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- Black American perceptions of black AfricansEthnic and Racial Studies, 1988
- Ethnicity and PracticeComparative Studies in Society and History, 1987
- The significance of social identitiesBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1986
- great performances: Toraja cultural identity in the 1970sAmerican Ethnologist, 1984
- Outline of a Theory of PracticePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1977
- Custom and Politics in Urban AfricaPublished by University of California Press ,1969