The "impact factor" revisited
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 5 December 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Biomedical Digital Libraries
- Vol. 2 (1) , 7
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-2-7
Abstract
The number of scientific journals has become so large that individuals, institutions and institutional libraries cannot completely store their physical content. In order to prioritize the choice of quality information sources, librarians and scientists are in need of reliable decision aids. The "impact factor" (IF) is the most commonly used assessment aid for deciding which journals should receive a scholarly submission or attention from research readership. It is also an often misunderstood tool. This narrative review explains how the IF is calculated, how bias is introduced into the calculation, which questions the IF can or cannot answer, and how different professional groups can benefit from IF use.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fieldsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005
- Impact of FUTON and NAA Bias on Visibility of ResearchMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2004
- Rank‐normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categoriesProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2004
- Misconduct finding at Bell Labs shakes physics communityNature, 2002
- Errors in citation statisticsNature, 2002
- Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genomeNature, 2001
- ‘What authors want’Learned Publishing, 1999
- The persistence of fraud in the literature: The Darsee caseJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1992
- National citationsNature, 1990
- Adjusted age distribution and its application to impact factor and immediacy indexJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1981