Microvascular Complications at Time of Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Are Similar Among Diabetic Patients Detected by Targeted Screening and Patients Newly Diagnosed in General Practice
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 26 (9) , 2604-2608
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.9.2604
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To investigate whether screening-detected diabetic patients differ from diabetic patients newly diagnosed in general practice with regard to the presence of microvascular complications. RESEARCH AND DESIGN METHODS—Diabetic patients, identified by a population-based targeted screening procedure consisting of a screening questionnaire and a fasting capillary whole-blood glucose measurement followed by diagnostic testing, were compared with patients newly diagnosed with diabetes in general practice. Retinopathy was assessed with fundus photography, impaired foot sensitivity was assessed with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, and the presence of microalbuminuria was measured by means of the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR). RESULTS—A total of 195 screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and 60 patients newly diagnosed in general practice participated in the medical examination. The prevalence of retinopathy was higher in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients than in patients newly diagnosed in general practice, but not significantly higher. The prevalence of retinopathy was 7.6% (95% CI 4.6–12.4) in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and 1.9% (0.3–9.8) in patients newly diagnosed in general practice. The prevalence of impaired foot sensitivity was similar in both groups, 48.1% (40.9–55.3) and 48.3% (36.2–60.7), respectively. The ACR was 0.61 (interquartile range 0.41–1.50) in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and 0.99 (0.53–2.49) in patients newly diagnosed in general practice. The difference in prevalence of microalbuminuria was not statistically significant. The prevalence of microalbuminuria was 17.2% (95% CI 12.5–23.2) and 26.7% (17.1–39.0) in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and patients newly diagnosed in general practice, respectively. CONCLUSIONS—Targeted screening for type 2 diabetes (with a screening questionnaire as a first step) resulted in the identification of previously undiagnosed diabetic patients with a considerable prevalence of microvascular complications.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The metabolic syndrome influences the risk of chronic complications in patients with Type II diabetesDiabetologia, 2001
- Screening for type 2 diabetes.Diabetes Care, 2000
- Plasma glucose and prediction of microvascular disease and mortality: evaluation of 1997 American Diabetes Association and 1999 World Health Organization criteria for diagnosis of diabetes.Diabetes Care, 2000
- Lower-extremity amputation in diabetes. The independent effects of peripheral vascular disease, sensory neuropathy, and foot ulcers.Diabetes Care, 1999
- 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of HypertensionJournal Of Hypertension, 1999
- Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38BMJ, 1998
- Microalbuminuria is strongly associated with NIDDM and hypertension, but not with the insulin resistance syndrome: the Hoorn StudyDiabetologia, 1998
- Performance of an NIDDM Screening Questionnaire Based on Symptoms and Risk FactorsDiabetes Care, 1997
- Comparison of tests for glycated haemoglobin and fasting and two hour plasma glucose concentrations as diagnostic methods for diabetesBMJ, 1994
- Onset of NIDDM occurs at Least 4–7 yr Before Clinical DiagnosisDiabetes Care, 1992