Improved detection of bacterial growth in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis effluent by use of BacT/Alert FAN bottles
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 35 (4) , 862-6
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.4.862-866.1997
Abstract
Culture-negative peritonitis is a major complication for patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and precludes organism-specific therapy. The aim of the present study was to compare inoculation of 10 ml of CAPD effluent into BacT/Alert blood culture bottles (FAN [fastidious antimicrobic neutralizing], BacTAlert aerobic [BTA], and BacT/Alert anaerobic [BTAn] bottles) to our conventional method of using 50 ml of concentrated CAPD effluent to inoculate peptone broth bottles (BD bottles) and MacConkey agar and blood agar medium (BA-MAC). The FAN, BTA, and BTAn bottles were monitored automatically in the BacT/Alert blood culture instrument. A total of 207 CAPD effluents were studied, and in 97 bacteria were detected by at least one method. Compared to BTA bottles (79 of 97; 81.4%), BTAn bottles (78 of 97; 80.4%), and BD bottles (88 of 97; 90.7%), the single best broth medium for detecting bacterial growth in CAPD effluents was the FAN bottle (90 of 97 effluents; 92.8%). A total of 125 bacterial species were detected by any method, and the majority (91.8%) of CAPD effluents were infected with a single species. A combination of FAN and BTAn bottles detected 111 of 125 (88.8%) of all organisms, whereas a combination of BD bottles and BA-MAC detected 107 of 125 (85.6%) of all organisms. One or more organisms that would have been completely missed by the conventional method with BD bottles and BA-MAC were detected in 18 CAPD effluents. Of these 18 CAPD effluents, 6 showed no growth by the conventional method with BD bottles and BA-MAC. On the basis of our data, the most sensitive and least labor intensive method was direct inoculation of 10 ml of CAPD effluent into a FAN bottle and a BTAn bottle, which could be automatically monitored by the BacT/Alert blood culture instrument. On the basis of case definitions for peritonitis, the sensitivities and specificities of the methods with FAN and BTAn bottles and with BD bottles and BA-MAC were 81.1 and 98.8% and 74.5 and 96.5%, respectively.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Routine laboratory diagnosis of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis peritonitis using centrifugation/lysis and saponin-containing mediaEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1994
- Microbiological aspects of peritonitis associated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisClinical Microbiology Reviews, 1992
- A comparison of four culture methods for diagnosing infection in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisJournal of Hospital Infection, 1990
- Evaluation of the Lysis-Centrifugation System for Culturing Dialysates From Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients With PeritonitisAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1988
- Diagnosis of peritonitis.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1987
- Comparison of methods for processing dialysate in suspected continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitisDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1987
- Centrifugation of 50 ml of peritoneal fluid is sufficient for microbiological examination in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients with peritonitisInfection, 1986
- Laboratory diagnosis of peritonitis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1982
- Peritonitis During Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal DialysisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1980
- Epidemic of Aseptic Peritonitis Caused by Endotoxin during Chronic Peritoneal DialysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977