The need for a national body for research misconduct
- 6 June 1998
- Vol. 316 (7146) , 1686-1687
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1686
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lessons from the Bristol case. More openness--on risks and on individual surgeons' performance.1998
- Retraction. Evidence of unmet need in the care of physically disabled adults.1998
- Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom An American perspective on research integrity Conduct unbecoming---the MRC's approach An editor's response to fraudsters Deception: difficulties and initiatives Honest advice from DenmarkBMJ, 1998
- Was the paper I wrote a fraud?BMJ, 1998
- Doctor admits research fraud.1998
- Misconduct in research: editors respondBMJ, 1997
- Will the UK COPE?The Lancet, 1997
- Research misconduct.Gut, 1997
- Evidence of unmet need in the care of severely physically disabled adults.BMJ, 1993