AUTO‐MAINTENANCE IN THE PIGEON: SUSTAINED PECKING DESPITE CONTINGENT NON‐REINFORCEMENT2
- 1 July 1969
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 12 (4) , 511-520
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-511
Abstract
If a response key is regularly illuminated for several seconds before food is presented, pigeons will peck it after a moderate number of pairings; this “auto-shaping” procedure of Brown and Jenkins (1968) was explored further in the present series of four experiments. The first showed that pecking was maintained even when pecks turned off the key and prevented reinforcement (auto-maintenance); the second controlled for possible effects of generalization and stimulus change. Two other experiments explored procedures that manipulated the tendency to peck the negatively correlated key by introducing alternative response keys which had no scheduled consequences. The results indicate that pecking can be established and maintained by certain stimulus-reinforcer relationships, independent of explicit or adventitious contingencies between response and reinforcer.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- AUTO‐SHAPING OF THE PIGEON'S KEY‐PECK1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- CONDITIONING OF THE AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF PIGEONS BY A FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967
- Relation between response amplitude and reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966
- The operant conditioning of fighting behavior in ratsThe Psychological Record, 1963
- CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED AGGRESSION IN PIGEONSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963
- The misbehavior of organisms.American Psychologist, 1961
- Schedules of reinforcement.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1957