Why did the breast cancer lymph node status distribution improve in Denmark in the pre-mammography screening period of 1978–1994?
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Acta Oncologica
- Vol. 49 (3) , 313-321
- https://doi.org/10.3109/02841861003602074
Abstract
Danish breast cancer patients diagnosed in 1978-1994 experienced a trend over time towards a more favourable distribution of lymph node status at time of diagnosis, which was not due to mammography screening. We investigated how this trend could be explained by patient characteristics at diagnosis: age (biological processes), calendar period (e.g. environmental changes), birth cohort (living conditions over a life time), post-menopausal status (a predictor of less favourable nodal status), and tumour diameter (a marker of detection time). The data set consisted of 22 955 patients aged 30-69 years at time of diagnosis with known lymph node status, known tumour diameter, known menopausal status, and clinically detected tumours, available from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Age, period, cohort, menopausal status, and tumour diameter were used as predictors in generalised linear models with either node-positive status (at least one of the excised lymph nodes being tumour-positive) or severely node-positive status (at least half of the excised lymph nodes being tumour-positive) as outcomes. Lymph node status was assessed both empirically and estimated using an EM algorithm in order to reduce misclassification. We found that the improved lymph node status distribution was most likely a period effect due to a combination of earlier detection of clinical tumours, explaining most of the trend in node-positive breast cancer and half of the trend in severely node-positive breast cancer, and some unknown factor affecting lymph node status but not necessarily other tumour characteristics.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in breast cancer during three decades in Denmark: Stage at diagnosis, surgical management and survivalActa Oncologica, 2008
- Does the introduction of sentinel node biopsy increase the number of node positive patients with early breast cancer? A population based study form the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative GroupActa Oncologica, 2008
- Do changes in lymph node status distribution explain trends in survival of breast cancer patients in Denmark?European Journal Of Cancer Prevention, 2006
- Easy SAS Calculations for Risk or Prevalence Ratios and DifferencesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- A Modified Nottingham Prognostic Index for Breast Cancer Patients Diagnosed in Denmark 1978–1994Acta Oncologica, 2001
- Impact of Axillary Dissection on Staging and Regional Control in Breast Tumors = 10 mm: The DBCG experienceActa Oncologica, 2000
- Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52 705 women with breast cancer and 108 411 women without breast cancerThe Lancet, 1997
- Tumor-related prognostic factors for breast cancerCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1997
- Axillary dissection of level I and II lymph nodes is important in breast cancer classificationEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1992
- Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II: Age–period–cohort modelsStatistics in Medicine, 1987