Abstract
The distribution of the Arden ratio (A) and another dimensionless EOG [electrooculography] quantity (G) devised by Gliem in a sample of normal human subjects was presented. The minimum, median and maximum values for A were 148-241-449 and for G, 34-88-167. A demonstrated a smaller degree of dispersion than G, the latter resembling in this respect the EOG potential parameters of the same sample. The average accumulation of errors due to inaccurate assessment of the included potential figures was almost equal in the functions of A and G. Differences between the figures from the present and earlier investigations were discussed with the general advantage of dimensionless EOG parameters. The present investigation did not demonstrate the need to replace or supplement the Arden ratio by the Gliem quantity.