What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
- 25 September 1995
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 89 (3) , 634-647
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979
Abstract
We examine some issues in the estimation of time-series cross-section models, calling into question the conclusions of many published studies, particularly in the field of comparative political economy. We show that the generalized least squares approach of Parks produces standard errors that lead to extreme overconfidence, often underestimating variability by 50% or more. We also provide an alternative estimator of the standard errors that is correct when the error structures show complications found in this type of model. Monte Carlo analysis shows that these “panel-corrected standard errors” perform well. The utility of our approach is demonstrated via a reanalysis of one “social democratic corporatist” model.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Riding Waves or Making Waves? The Services and the U.S. Defense Budget, 1981–1993American Political Science Review, 1994
- Racial Threat and Partisan IdentificationAmerican Political Science Review, 1994
- Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic PerformanceAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- Does Trade Still Follow the Flag?American Political Science Review, 1989
- Elements of EconometricsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1988
- Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical EssayAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1985
- Bootstrapping a Regression Equation: Some Empirical ResultsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Efficient Estimation of a System of Regression Equations when Disturbances are Both Serially and Contemporaneously CorrelatedJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1967
- The Unbiasedness of Zellner's Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations EstimatorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1967