How Reliable are Selected Scales from Population-based Health Surveys? An Analysis Among Seniors
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Canadian Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 90 (1) , 60-64
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03404102
Abstract
The objective of the study was to assess the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of selected scales from four national and provincial surveys used to study the health status of community-dwelling seniors. Items on physical impairment, psychological well-being, activities of daily living, chronic health problems, social support, and stressful life events were selected from these surveys and administered in a group of 1,054 seniors, aged 65 and over, living in Wellington County, Ontario. Each scale exhibited high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.70) except for the stressful life events and social support scales. The intra-class coefficients (ρ) for all scales were > 0.80. In addition, almost all single items measures used in this study also exhibited high test-retest reliability (kappa > 0.80) except for measures of perceived health status (kappa = 0.69) and availability of help in crisis situation (kappa = 0.48). l’étude avait pour objectif d’évaluer la cohérence interne et la fiabilité test-retest d’échelles sélectionnées dans quatre enquêtes nationales et provinciales visant à étudier l’état de santé de personnes âgées vivant en communauté. Des éléments relatifs aux handicaps physiques, au bien-être psychologique, aux activités quotidiennes, aux problèmes de santé chroniques, au soutien social, et aux événements stressants ont été sélectionnés dans ces enquêtes et administrés à 1 054 personnes âgées de 65 ans et plus, vivant dans le comté de Wellington en Ontario. Chaque échelle a montré une cohérence interne élevée (alpha de Cronbach ≥ 0,70) sauf dans le cas des échelles relatives aux événements stressants et au soutien social. Les coefficients intra-classe (ρ) pour toutes les échelles étaient supérieurs à 0,80. En outre, pratiquement toutes les mesures relatives à des éléments uniques utilisées dans cette étude affichaient une fiabilité test-retest élevée (kappa > 0,80) à l’exception des mesures de la perception de l’état de santé (kappa = 0,69) et de la disponibilité d’aide en cas de crise (kappa = 0,48).Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Companion Animals on the Physical and Psychological Health of Older People: An Analysis of a One‐Year Longitudinal StudyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1999
- Measuring and Monitoring General Health Status in Elderly Persons: Practical and Methodological Issues in Using the SF-36 Health SurveyThe Gerontologist, 1996
- Test-Retest Reliability of a Questionnaire That Identifies Elders at Risk for Hospital AdmissionJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1994
- Measurement of Health Status in the 1990sAnnual Review of Public Health, 1990
- Stressful Life Events and Physician UtilizationJournal of Gerontology, 1988
- Geriatric Assessment: An Overview of Its ImpactsClinics in Geriatric Medicine, 1987
- The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical DataPublished by JSTOR ,1977
- The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of ReliabilityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 1951