Repetition Can Have Similar or Different Effects on Accurate and False Recognition
- 28 February 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Memory and Language
- Vol. 46 (2) , 323-340
- https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2811
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2001
- On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2001
- VERIDICAL AND FALSE MEMORIES IN HEALTHY OLDER ADULTS AND IN DEMENTIA OF THE ALZHEIMER'S TYPECognitive Neuropsychology, 1999
- Conjoint recognition.Psychological Review, 1999
- Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Children's False MemoriesJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1998
- True and False Recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a Global Matching PerspectiveJournal of Memory and Language, 1998
- A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory modelPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1998
- Mere memory testing creates false memories in children.Developmental Psychology, 1996
- False-Recognition Reversal: When Similarity is DistinctiveJournal of Memory and Language, 1995
- Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968