Eligibility of patients in routine care for major clinical trials of anti–tumor necrosis factor α agents in rheumatoid arthritis
Open Access
- 4 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 48 (2) , 313-318
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10817
Abstract
Objective To identify the proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 2 cohorts from Nashville, Tennessee, who met basic criteria for inclusion in 2 important recent clinical trials of anti–tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) agents, the early RA (ERA) trial of etanercept versus methotrexate, and the anti-TNFα trial in RA with concomitant therapy (ATTRACT) study of infliximab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate. Methods Two cohorts of patients, all of whom had met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA at some time, were studied. Cohort E (early) comprised 232 patients who were under the care of 5 private practice rheumatologists, whose duration of RA was fewer than 3 years, and who were reviewed for basic inclusion criteria for the ERA clinical trial. Cohort L (long-term) comprised 152 consecutive patients who had been under care at a weekly academic rheumatology clinic for a mean of 4.5 years, and were reviewed for basic inclusion criteria for the ATTRACT study. Results In cohort E, basic inclusion criteria for the ERA trial were met by 11 of 36 patients (31%) who had not taken methotrexate, 8 of 19 patients (42%) who were at their first visit and had not taken methotrexate, and 37 of all 232 patients (16%). In cohort L, 5% of patients met the basic inclusion criteria for the ATTRACT study. Conclusion Most patients who were seen in routine care in these 2 cohorts did not meet the criteria for inclusion in these 2 important recent clinical trials. The conclusion that anti-TNFα therapy has greater efficacy than methotrexate may be valid only in a limited number of patients with the most severe RA. Anti-TNFα therapy may be desirable in most patients with RA, but this possibility has not been studied formally. Criteria for inclusion in RA clinical trials might be modified for greater generalizability of results.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: Two‐year radiographic and clinical outcomesArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- The relationship of serum infliximab concentrations to clinical improvement in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from ATTRACT, a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trialArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Lower Disease Activity and Disability in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in 1995 Compared with 1978Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1999
- Clinical improvement and radiological deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence that the pathogenesis of synovial inflammation and articular erosion may differRheumatology, 1996
- Rheumatoid Arthritis: Treat Now, Not Later!Annals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 1996
- A simplified twenty‐eight–joint quantitative articular index in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1989
- Reassessment of Twelve Traditional Paradigms Concerning the Diagnosis, Prevalence, Morbidity and Mortality of Rheumatoid ArthritisScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1989
- Rheumatoid arthritis: Disappointing long-term outcomes despite successful short-term clinical trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988