Caesarean Section Rates, Australia 1986: Variations at State and Small Area Level
- 1 November 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 31 (4) , 299-304
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1991.tb02806.x
Abstract
The first national study of Caesarean section rates was made possible by combining 1986 data from hospital morbidity collections and medicare claims. Rates per 100 births, based on the area of usual residence of the mother, were calculated for statistical local areas, which were aggregated to statistical subdivisions, statistical divisions and States. The rate for mainland Australia was 16.9% (Tasmania could not be included). Variations in rates were of the order of one and a half- to two-fold. The highest rates were found in Canberra and central Brisbane (26.3% and 25.4% respectively). The rates for Northern Territory, South Australia, and Queensland were higher than those for other States. There were few consistent patterns in the variations. Generally rates were highest in the State capital cities and for insured women. This suggests an association with the supply of obstetricians and with demand factors such as the expectations of obstetricians and consumers.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of Nonclinical Factors on Repeat Cesarean SectionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Trends in caesarean section in Western Australia, 1980‐1987The Medical Journal of Australia, 1990
- Obstetrics and litigation: a consumer perspectiveThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1990
- The Challenges of Medical Practice VariationsPublished by Springer Nature ,1990
- Holding back the tide of caesareans.BMJ, 1988
- Which Rate Is Right?New England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- CAESAREAN‐SECTION RATES IN AUSTRALIA: A POPULATION‐BASED AUDITThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1979